Nashville rezoning trends

What 1,420 tracked cases across 42 Nashville cities show about where and what is getting entitled. Built from official Planning & Zoning agendas, updated as packets drop.

Busiest of the last 12 completed months (Nov 2025 – Oct 2026): Sep 2026 with 302 cases scheduled.

Data current as of — updated as agenda packets are captured. Activity here reflects the cases in our collected archive grouped by their scheduled hearing date, not confirmed hearings or approvals.

Tracked cases by scheduled hearing month — last 12 completed months (Nov 2025 – Oct 2026)

Nov 20250
Dec 20253
Jan 202682
Feb 202684
Mar 202675
Apr 202692
May 2026100
Jun 2026104
Jul 2026108
Aug 2026151
Sep 2026302
Oct 2026263

November 2026 is still in progress and is not charted; hearings already held this month appear in the public archive as they are captured. Counts are the cases we captured, grouped by scheduled hearing date — coverage varies by city and month, so month-to-month changes reflect our capture as well as market activity.

Case types

Plat / Replat464
Other305
Rezoning230
Site Plan228
PD Amendment107
Ordinance / Text Amendment40
Annexation20
Comp Plan Amendment19

Most active cities

Franklin176
Gallatin168
Columbia116
Murfreesboro87
Maury County77
Nashville70
White House69
Lebanon62
Thompson's Station57
Fairview, TN54
La Vergne52
Goodlettsville51

By county

Williamson407
Sumner217
Maury208
Rutherford155
Davidson133
Wilson128
Robertson97
Putnam37
Dickson14
Coffee12
Watch how to use these trends · 2:41

The charts summarize the archive, not completed construction or final approvals: use them to form a question, then answer it from the records.

Recorded September 2026 using historical records; the site may have changed since. Not a live feed.

Read the transcript

Once you have explored individual cases, the next question is how to follow the activity that matters to your team. You may care about a particular applicant, a corridor or a few cities. P&Z Radar’s public archive can help you define that focus. Let’s look at applicant history and market activity, then review the monitoring options without turning every filing into an inbox distraction.

The petitioner index groups names found in the collected cases. Open one and you can review its recorded filings, cities and dates. This is useful background when researching who is active in a market. Treat the name as it appears in the record, and check the individual cases before assuming two similar names are the same organization. A filing history is research material, not proof that someone is currently buying your service.

Next, look at trends. The charts summarize the archive by scheduled hearing month, case type and geography. They can help you decide where to investigate next, but they are not a count of completed construction or final approvals. Changes can also reflect what was captured in the archive. Use the chart to form a question, then move back to individual records and sources to answer it.

Now define what your team actually needs to follow. One city, a county and a whole metro are different research scopes. Review the available coverage before choosing one. The product describes matching alerts and keyword filters; the public trial gives you a way to evaluate the data in a city. Start narrowly enough that you can read what arrives and judge whether the matches are relevant.

For a team workflow, review how the information is delivered. The site describes email and private RSS options, with API access on the eligible plans. Developers should check the documented host, authentication and limits before connecting a system. Keep private feed links and API keys private. An integration is only useful when it brings the right records into a place your team actually checks and preserves a link back to the source.

For your first week, choose one market, a small set of research questions and a simple way to review the results. Use applicant history to understand context, trends to spot areas worth investigating, and the original packets to check important details. Then evaluate whether ongoing monitoring earns a place in your routine. Start with the public archive and coverage page, and move into a trial when the records look relevant to your work.

Download captions: SRT · VTT

← Back to the case records

Most active petitioners

The applicants filing most often — click through for their full filing history.

PetitionerCases
Melodie Brady18
Greg Gamble, Kimley Horn13
615 Design Group11
Greenlid Design, LLC11
Pape-Dawson9
CSDG8
Daniel B. Pace7
Kimley-Horn7
Greg Gamble, Gamble Design Collaborative6
Abigail Overstreet, Wilson and Associates5

Browse by city: Franklin · Gallatin · Columbia · Murfreesboro · Maury County · Nashville · White House · Lebanon · Thompson's Station · Fairview, TN · La Vergne · Goodlettsville

These are the cases that already happened. Subscribers get the ones still ahead — emailed as each packet is captured, ahead of the hearing where the city posts ahead. Start a free trial.